QM 3.3 Specific and descriptive criteria are provided for the evaluation of learners’ work, and their connection to the course grading policy is clearly explained. (Essential)

Refresh Your Course

General Suggestions

• Criteria may be in the form of a detailed checklist, rubric, or other evaluation instrument that defines characteristics of the successful finished work (e.g., discussions, quizzes, exams, group projects).

• Projects include information on how the group and/or individual will be evaluated and how points will be assigned. 

• Develop rubrics that align with the learning objectives. The criteria in the rubric should directly reflect the skills and knowledge stated in the objectives.

• Share rubrics with students before they begin the assignment. This transparency helps students understand how their work will be evaluated and what they need to focus on to meet the learning objectives.

Faculty Development Opportunities

• Managing and Grading Discussions More Effectively in Your Canvas Course

• Tuning Up Your Gradebook in Canvas

• Gradescope: Speed up your Grading and Ramp Up Your Feedback Webinar

Regular and Substantive Interaction (RSI)/How this standard supports RSI

• Indirect impact: These practices help set up a clear and organized learning environment that encourages student engagement, but only count as regular and substantive interaction if you, as the instructor, use the criteria to give feedback or have discussions with students about their work.

Related Resources

• Create Transparent Assignments from eCampus Center