Page Comparison

Turnitin is Boise State’s plagiarism prevention tool. It is integrated with Canvas so that plagiarism review can be run on student submissions to Canvas assignments.

Turnitin accepts files in a wide variety of file formats, including .doc, .docx, .txt, .ppt, and .pdf.

The text from a student submission is analyzed and the system begins to check for possible text similarities or matches from their database containing sources from the wider internet, academically published material (licensed documents, reference works, etc.), and previously submitted student material.

When the system finds similarities in the text, it not only records the degree of the matches but also considers any paraphrasing and usage of synonyms as well as any evidence of ghost writing and contract cheating. The algorithms can detect similarities across most widely used languages.

A similarity report is generated at the end providing insights into textual matches in a reliable and easy-to-understand format. The percentage of matching text shown at the top of the report is in no way an absolute indication of plagiarism. The final decision rests on the evaluation and interpretation of the reviewerTurnitin compares student submissions to texts in their database and on the web. Turnitin generates a similarity report, which displays a similarity score, the percentage of matching text. The similarity score does not indicate plagiarism has occurred. The similarity score is one tool that the instructor can use to determine if plagiarism has occurred.

1. Longer/more formal/final writing pieces: If

1. an instructor breaks the writing process into discrete tasks (an annotated bibliography,

1. essay plan, introductory paragraph, drafts),

1. the instructor can inform students that the final draft

1. may be subject to plagiarism review.

1. 1. What about earlier drafts?

1. 1. It is not recommended to use use Turnitin for draft papers because students may not have cited sources in a draft, but they will likely do so in the final version.

2. In response to pervasive citation misuse in a course: If

1. students struggle with proper attribution, instructors can provide support on how and why to cite

1. and

1. announce that writing may be submitted for plagiarism review. One study shows that when students

1. know that a plagiarism

1. tool will be used, they are less likely to engage in

1. intentional plagiarism.

2. If something reads strangely:

1. Instructors read a lot of student writing develop a keen sense of voice and sometimes notice that something seems

1. odd. If something reads strangely

1. (voice

• Often times, things that ‘read strangely’ might simply be a developmental writing student trying out a new register of formality for their disciplinary writing, or an experienced graduate student tackling a new, harder style of academic writing as they advance their studies. Turnitin can often reassure us that that is the case by providing minimal matches. 

1. changes, style/voice is inconsistent from the student’s other writing, etc.), instructors can use Turnitin.

Please see this article for how to enable directions on using Turnitin for Canvas assignments in Canvas.

See this article for how to access directions on accessing Turnitin reports from in Canvas SpeedgraderSpeedGrader.

Consider your prompts:

• If students are asked to respond to a relatively factual or structured prompt, their answers simply can’t deviate from one another too much and still be correct. This can increase originality scores.

  • Example: If a prompt asks students to summarize one specific reading’s text’s main ideas, this might increase similarity scores since because the answers are rather narrow.This is not a reason to avoid questions like that - it’s simply something to stay aware of as the instructor, if you have plagiarism review on. possible responses are limited.

Consider your discipline’s specialty levels:

• Are you teaching a highly-specific subject matter? (Example: students write a narrative about the presence and responses to different heart arrhythmias in nursing.) Students’ repeated and correct usage of these discipline-specific terms in their writing can increase similarity scores. It doesn’t necessarily mean plagiarism is afoot - sometimes it just means that everyone is tracking the discipline-specific concepts and terms well. This might be a type of writing you wouldn't use plagiarism review for. 

Consider students’ experience with citations , and their need for reminders and support:

• Are students citing incorrectly? Are they using quotes that are significantly too long because they don’t yet know how/ why/ where to cut them into useful bits for their writing, and take the rest outto selectively quote or paraphrase?

  • This is not plagiarism. It is misuse of sources, often based on a developmental phase of writing. We recommend using our Writing Center’s resources , or teaching students about writing conventions from your discipline by considering and offering the ways you learned how to do it yourself. 

• No matter how ‘experienced,’ ‘advanced’ and ‘intelligent/ talented/ hard-working’ a student is, and no matter how much you may feel it isn’t your job to teach ‘basic elements of writing’ - sometimes it is. 

  It is your job to provide supports if your students demonstrate that they

  Regardless of a student’s perceived abilities, sometimes instructors need to teach basic writing skills and to support students who do not understand citation practices.

Turnitin has a secure database and has gone through a review for FERPA compliance, FERPA-compliant database. It is safe to save student submissions to the database; this means that future submissions will be analyzed against past student submissions.

However, if desired you an instructor can choose not to save student submissions to the database when you set setting up Turnitin for your Canvas assignments. Simply uncheck a Canvas assignment by unchecking the box that says for “Index All Submissions.”